Are All Really Welcome?
This is actually my newsletter article for February 2012. I had some requests for it, so I thought I’d post it here for easy access.
From Pastor Lars
Recently I’ve been thinking about the use the phrase “all are welcome” on church publicity materials and web sites. We do it, as does pretty much every church I know. Even if they don’t say it, they never say something contradictory, like “only some people welcome here” or “interview here first to see if you’re welcome material” Yet it seems that as easy as that phrase is to say, it’s much harder to put into action.
Take, for example, the whole issue of welcoming convicts released from prison. Some may have greater offenses than others, but 98% of all convicts will be freed eventually. And, with almost 5% of the country in prison at any given time, that adds up to a lot of people with a past. Are they welcome? Really? Or are we thinking, in the back of our minds, “I didn’t mean them….”
What about those whose political views are opposite ours? Or those who have a radically different lifestyle, even one we don’t approve of? Or those we don’t even like? I could go on.

It’s not as easy as it sounds to welcome all. That means that we would be just as excited to see at worship (or any ministry) someone who has no money at all as someone with tons. We would invite the homeless family to brunch as willingly as the ones with nicer clothes.
But that is not always how the church works. In the book of James, they have this exact problem:
James 2:1-4 My brothers and sisters, do you with your acts of favoritism really believe in our glorious Lord Jesus Christ? 2 For if a person with gold rings and in fine clothes comes into your assembly, and if a poor person in dirty clothes also comes in, 3 and if you take notice of the one wearing the fine clothes and say, “Have a seat here, please,” while to the one who is poor you say, “Stand there,” or, “Sit at my feet,” 4 have you not made distinctions among yourselves, and become judges with evil thoughts?
We can easily scoff at the people in James’ church, but we’re human beings. We live in a world that makes distinctions, and we have mixed motives that sometimes we don’t even understand consciously. The ex-con scares us, the poor person doesn’t have money to give us to pay our bills. But the person with money, that benefits us as a church to get them to join. A few more families like that and we might pay off the mortgage. A few more homeless people and, well, we’ll still have that mortgage for a few more years.
There are many arguments used to justify not welcoming all equally. Some say that there are safety concerns, or that certain churches just aren’t “equipped” to deal with “certain people,” or that discrimination is something we do to ourselves – the whole “birds of a feather” logic that says that people really only want to be with people like themselves – regardless of welcome. We can’t, of course, always tell the back story of a person by clothes and language and outside factors (many very dangerous people look very professional), but it doesn’t mean our minds don’t go there.
And then what do you do when some people say that they just aren’t comfortable being at a church with “those people” – whoever they are – and will just have to go somewhere else if “they” start filling the pews. Now you’re going to lose either way, in effect making a decision that will cause someone to leave: so who has to go? Politically, those already here have the edge over those who are new, so to protect the institution the new people are given a less-than-enthusiastic welcome.
And yet, there’s another side to it that makes things complicated. All people are welcome, but not all behaviors are. You can be of any income, but you can’t run around destroying things or attacking people. In theory, you shouldn’t be able to run around gossiping or forming exclusive power cliques or playing manipulative games, but churches don’t always have the best track record for enforcing that.
So we say that all are welcome, but you’re not welcome to do whatever you want. But this gets tricky too. How do we define this? Egregious crimes, sure. But what about politics, ideology, theology? How much do you have to agree to be welcome as a full member? How much disagreement do we allow? Are you welcome only until you change to become like us? Churches are accused of loving you as you are only for a probationary period, at which point you need to get with the program. But certainly, the Gospel is transformative, and changes us, so shouldn’t we expect some conformity at some point? But in what ways?
If you look at Jesus’ own ministry, he seemed both very welcoming and very exclusive at the same time. On the one hand, his own followers were a mixed lot, of those who seemed very upright (Nathanael, in whom there is no deceit), those with no money (Mary Magdalene), those with radical political agendas and violent pasts (Judas Iscariot and Simon the Zealot), and those who were loaded with cash (like Matthew the tax collector and Mary and Martha). His followers were a diverse bunch. And yet, many people who came to follow him were flat out turned away and told to go home, while others were given huge conditions to meet first, like the rich man who was told to sell all his possessions and give them to the poor.
I have come to the conclusion that Jesus was perfectly willing to turn away those who were going to try to hijack his ministry, control his agenda, or try to dictate how things would be done. He was comfortable turning away those who were not ready, or who were too attached to worldly things. But, those are behavioral criteria, and they were never permanent. The rich man could have sold his stuff and come back. It was his choice. But he didn’t want to make it.
Which is why we will always need to keep revisiting the question of welcome. We will probably never do it perfectly well, and will inevitably fall back into thinking of welcoming (and evangelism in general) as getting people to support our church institution, rather than a purely selfless act of trying to spread the Gospel for the sake of the kingdom, regardless of the cost/benefit for us. But if we are going to say “all are welcome”, we will need to always stand convicted before those words, re-evaluating and praying and asking again and again for God’s guidance to do as Jesus did. Some may not want to follow Christ, or may not be willing to act in a manner that’s conducive to life in community. There is nothing we can do. We can’t change the Gospel. But we can try to live it like Christ did, and truly, actively, welcome all – not as the world welcomes, but as Jesus did.
Peace,
Pastor Lars
Well, it took us a little while to get all our ducks in a row and get the campaign started, but we finally are a go. This Lent (from February 26-April 7) we’re making it a sort of theme. Incorporating change offerings from kids in the Sunday School, special donations from the men’s group at Lord of Grace and others, our plan is to raise another $3,000.00 from our church and write a $6,000 check to Lutheran World Relief this Easter for their clean water projects. The amazing thing is, third world costs being what they are, $500 can supply a whole water system for a village. I don’t think I could even get the permits for a well here for that amount. But it goes to show how much can be done with what to us, in the wealthy West, is not really all that much money.
One of my first funerals as a new pastor was for a man named Chuck Graff. He lived in Wilmette, Illinois, and was a marine in WWII. And not just any marine, he stormed Iwo Jima, and made it to the top of the hill with the guys who raised the flag. He showed me his case of medals – tons of them – and well-deserved. Here was a man who lost 1/3 of everyone he knew in the morning by the end of the day. He’s part of the reason our country is still standing. Yet, when I say Iwo Jima today, how many people remember?





I also got to visit some different churches, including this one: Bear River Lutheran. It’s literally out in the middle of the woods, right next to The Bear River, about 70 miles from Canada. It’s been there since 1915, and still has a small, but vibrant worshiping community.
And, by 9pm we got to pull up our chairs in the east end of the parking lot and watch the Marana fireworks. For me it’s the perfect spot, being far enough away to not have your ears blasted, but close enough to see everything clearly. Plus, and this is a big plus, you don’t have to fight the traffic on Silverbell and Cortaro.
A couple days ago (July 3rd) a bunch of us from Lord of Grace went out with our kids to the 


